India Chances To win WordlCup T20 2016

Friends i am great fan of Cricket and it is my passion as well.My dreams are become a cricketer and play cricket for my nation. But conditions are not so good in terms of financially .

I have played under 14 and under 16 for my school from D.AV. Sr . Sec School Chandigarh. Now Come to Indian Cricket. Now these days India team playing really cool and confident game. MS Dhoni is true leader of Indian Cricket .If your leader is strong from his thinking then your team will always motivated with you.

Past couple of years Indian Team Top in the ICC World rankings T20, One day and test matches Games. Youngster in Indian team are playing really cool .

India Team beast Australia in Australia 3-0 in T 20 games and it is complete white wash for them.They Beat Sir Lanka in T20 again after the 1 down in the series.

They Beat Bangladesh in Asia T20 match in their home. Virat Kohli , Shikar Dhawan, Suresh Raina they all is great form . As always Captain cool MS Dhoni the legend and finisher performing very well. Great new for Indian cricket that Yuvraj Singh give hints of his form is back and i hope he will continue with the same.

Now talked about middle order there is Sir Ravinder Jadega, Pandhya both are great finisher and All rounder. They both are contributing with ball , Bat and their fielding performances. We also have spin attach of experienced R. Ashwin and terminator Harbhjan Singh ( Bhajji) . As per my thinking if R. Ashwin bowled his 4 over and take 2-3 wickets in every match then no one stop team India to wind ICC T20 World cup 2016.

Now lets come to pace attack there s Ashish Nehra match winner and good hands of experience he have. At at age of 38 he is performing like a super man and his performance is improving in every match.

1 another fast bowler we have Jaspreet Bhumra and he have god gifted hand.His pace is around 150 miles per hour and swing ability for both the side give more attacking power.

At the end We all hope that as hosting Nation we will win this 2016 T20 world cup again.Best of Luck Team India.

India v New Zealand, 1st ODI, Dambulla

India undone by 'spongy' bounce

Siddarth Ravindran in Dambulla

August 11, 2010

Comments: 98 | Post yours as Ajay Chaudhary | Text size: A | A

	Ravindra Jadeja was one of several Indian batsmen caught at slip © AFP Enlarge
Related Links Players/Officials: MS Dhoni | Scott Styris Matches: India v New Zealand at Dambulla Series/Tournaments: Sri Lanka Triangular Series | New Zealand tour of Sri Lanka Teams: India | New Zealand

Every now and then the Indian batting is tested in difficult one-day conditions, and they usually tend to come up short, though not as spectacularly as against New Zealand in the opening match of the tri-series. Last year, they batted first on a damp pitch in Guwahati and were sliced to 27 for 5 by Mitchell Johnson and Doug Bollinger before Praveen Kumar and Ravindra Jadeja partially revived India with half-centuries. There was no lower-order rescue on Monday, and India slid to the lowest total in ODIs this year.

There wasn't the exaggerated movement which worked so well for India in the Asia Cup final, but the bounce and slowness of the track proved too much. MS Dhoni explained that while the pacy short ball has troubled some of the Indian batsmen, it was not what they were up against in Dambulla.

"This is completely different bounce, it is very spongy, bowlers are bowling 125-126 and the keeper is standing where he usually does for Shoaib Akhtar," Dhoni said. "You can't really drive off the backfoot, the only option is to cut and pull, and if the bowler doesn't give room, it is very difficult to score."

There were no magic deliveries from New Zealand to warrant such a limp display. All Daryl Tuffey and Kyle Mills did was keep the ball a touch short and maintain tight lines, which was enough to coax India's batsmen to give the New Zealand slip cordon a thorough workout. Rohit Sharma opened the face to steer to slip, Suresh Raina attempted a cover drive away from his body to edge to slip, Yuvraj Singh fished outside off to nick it to slip.

"Players in the subcontinent generally don't like the ball anywhere above the waist," Scott Styris said. "Not because they are scared but because it is different compared to the usual subcontinental wicket. This has lot more bounce and we learnt that during the practice sessions. We really wanted to put some short balls in there."

Styris had played a big role in New Zealand recovering from a top-order collapse, his 190-run partnership with Ross Taylor effectively putting the match beyond India. Dhoni was unhappy about the mistakes in the field that allowed New Zealand to reach such a commanding total. "There were a couple of missed chances, Styris missed stumping [when he was on 16], Ross Taylor's dropped catch [on 45 by Suresh Raina], still if we had got both of them they still would have got at least 200 which the way they bowled would have been very difficult to chase."

New Zealand packed their side with quick bowlers, a strategy which worked well for them, but India were left with only two quick bowlers for much of the innings after Abhimanyu Mithun's heat stroke. While the new-ball bowlers, Praveen Kumar and Ashish Nehra, took 7 for 90 between them, India's spinners were caned for 161 runs in 26 overs. "We had four fast bowlers and they had three. That was the difference," Styris said. "We knew that they didn't have reserves."

Siddarth Ravindran is a sub-editor at Cricinfo

Feeds: Siddarth Ravindran

© ESPN EMEA Ltd.

Make UDRS mandatory - Kumar Sangakkara

	There will be no UDRS in the Test series after India objected to its use © Getty Images
Related Links News : No UDRS for Sri Lanka-India Tests News : ICC wants review system used at World Cup Players/Officials: MS Dhoni | Kumar Sangakkara Series/Tournaments: India tour of Sri Lanka Teams: India | Sri Lanka

Kumar Sangakkara, the Sri Lanka captain, has asked the ICC to step in and make the Umpire Decision Review System (UDRS) mandatory for all Test series, following India's refusal to use it for the upcoming series. Sangakkara also said the ICC should perhaps pay for the technology needed to implement the system successfully, because it is something the ICC wants to introduce and the broadcasters have usually paid exorbitant monies for their rights and might not be able to afford extra costs for sophisticated tools such as Hot Spot.

"I was under the impression that the ICC has set the standards on this by saying that everyone should use the DRS system," Sangakkara said, suggesting he was not aware of the results of the latest discussion on UDRS at the ICC's annual conference. "I think last year in India also, the entire team felt a little hard done by when we came to know that we couldn't have the DRS."

The ICC's directive, too, was as ambiguous as the body's role is in international cricket. "The host member would determine whether to use DRS in home Test series (following consultation with the visiting country)," said the ICC release, in one sentence giving the home board the power to "determine" whether the UDRS should be used, and also empowering the visiting team to contest it.

"The role that ICC has to play here is to make sure that all boards are bound to have the DRS," Sangakkara said, "Rather than when one side refuses, the other side can't enforce the DRS, as is under the current playing conditions.

Sangakkara reiterated how the absence of DRS hurt his side on its tour of India ("It cost us close to 500 runs and lots of wickets"), and also how the presence of the same system proved to be an advantage when they hosted India in 2008. Then, Sri Lanka successfully challenged 11 decisions as opposed to India's one.

"There were of course complaints by the Indian team, which led to - I think - subsequent series' being played without the review system," Sangakkara said. "Having reviewed all the matches, there are flaws. You need Hot Spot and all, but even with the existing technology in place, we can still have a very fair DRS."

MS Dhoni explained his side's decision with what has been a genuine concern with the UDRS: why challenge decisions when the best available technology is not being used? "DRS is still not a 100 % correct system," Dhoni said. "We have seen that, in spite of having the DRS, not everything goes correct. Most of the teams have played a series under the DRS, so it is important now to come up with a foolproof plan. See what exactly works. In a bat-pad scenario, Hot Spot really works, it is close to over 98 % correct. Even on LBW decisions, we need to have something like that."

Which brings us to the present conundrum: Several broadcasters pushed themselves to the commercial brink to secure telecast rights, and they obviously hadn't budgeted for the extra cost to make the UDRS successful. Which is what makes the ICC's role important, because essentially the DRS is its baby. "That's another option [paying for the technology] maybe the ICC should look at," Sangakkara said. "Provide the technology, make everything standard, if the costs the exorbitant, subsidise the costs. These are all the things we can look at. Maybe the broadcasters - they of course pay such a lot for cricket, but they also make sure they earn almost as much - maybe they could work out ways of subsiding it."